Sarah Koch Associate

/ P (202) 524-4144

LinkedIn connect on LinkedIn / Twitter @IfrahLaw

Sarah Koch (formerly Coffey) brings skills in both civil and criminal law to her work for Ifrah Law clients. Sarah has built a strong track record in cases regarding i-gaming, e-commerce, government contracts, and criminal fraud.

Sarah helps i-gaming clients navigate the changing landscape of internet gaming law by tracking developments on the state and federal level as they occur.  This real-time analysis gives clients the opportunity to quickly make informed decisions and seize opportunities in limited markets ahead of their competitors.  Sarah has advised some of the biggest i-gaming companies in the world on issues relating to licensure, regulatory compliance, acquisitions, and litigation.

During her time as a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) law clerk, Sarah worked on investigations and enforcement actions involving Internet marketing campaigns, negative-option continuity plans, and trade regulation compliance. Today, she uses an insider’s knowledge of consumer protection law to advise e-commerce clients on compliance with advertising guidelines, and to assist them in state and federal government enforcement actions.  At a time when the FTC is stepping up its scrutiny of affiliate networks and social media marketing, her experience is invaluable to businesses engaged in Internet advertising and marketing.

For Ifrah Law’s government contractor clients, Sarah has assisted with bid protests, SBA proceedings, and employment law matters including COBRA and ERISA disputes. She has also worked on a number of cases brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) alleging violations of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Sarah’s other criminal defense cases have included charges of mortgage fraud, marriage fraud, and military BAH fraud. Sarah also acts as a pro bono guardian ad litem in D.C. Superior Court, where she represents the best interest of the child in custody disputes.

Sarah was first published in Case Western Reserve’s  Journal of International Law, with an article regarding property rights to natural resources in outer space. This article received the Note of the Year award. Sarah has also published articles in Gambling Insider (“State of Opportunity,”  February 2014); Gaming Intelligence (“The Law According to NJ,” September 2013); World Online Gambling Law Report (“New Jersey’s Draft Regulations: Beyond Gaming Operators,” July 2013;“One Governor, Two Vetoes: New Jersey’s I-Gaming Bills,” February 2013;  “Tainted Asset Rules Decrease US State I-Gaming Success,” June 2012), iGaming Business North America (“The Reid-Kyl Bill and the Federal Cause,” December/January 2012/13),  and iGaming Business Magazine (“The Momentous Law for US Poker,” May/June 2011).

"State of Opportunity," Gambling InsiderFebruary 2014
"The Law According to NJ," Gaming IntelligenceSeptember 2013
"New Jersey’s Draft Regulations: Beyond Gaming Operators," World Online Gambling Law ReportJuly 2013
Jeff Ifrah, Speaker; Sarah Coffey, Moderator, "Home Truths: New Jersey’s Path to I-Gaming Regulation and its Future in the US Online Gaming Market" EGR North America Panel, The Pier Shops at Caesars in Atlantic City, NJMay 20, 2013
"The future of egaming: Bet on New Jersey," EGR North AmericaMarch 2013
"One Governor, two vetoes: New Jersey’s i-gaming bills," World Online Gambling Law ReportFebruary 2013
"The Reid-Kyl Bill and the Federal Cause" iGaming Business North America MagazineDecember/January 2012/13
"Tainted Asset Rules Decrease US State i-Gaming Success," World Online Gambling Law ReportJune 2012
"The Momentous Law for US Poker," iGaming Business Magazine May/June 2011

Turning the Tables on Fraudulent Direct Marketing Tactics

When an Internet retailer of consumer products discovered fraud by the direct marketing agency it had retained to promote its products online, Ifrah PLLC helped the retailer turn the tables.

Although the direct marketing agency, or affiliate network, agreed to craft a marketing campaign that complied with all advertising and consumer protection laws, it failed to do so. The network drove millions of leads to the retailer, a substantial number of those turned out to be from webpages containing claims the retailer did not approve.

This resulted in a substantial loss of advertising dollars for our client, the possible loss of good will among its customers, and exposure to state and federal consumer protection claims.

After we advised the retailer to stop paying the affiliate network, it filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit in federal court in California seeking $2.5 million in damages. We responded by filing a countersuit for the non-compliant webpages.

In our analysis of the lawsuit, we discovered a legal flaw in the agency’s case that would require the court to dismiss it. Rather than immediately attempt to litigate this issue, we contacted the agency’s lawyers and gave them several opportunities to withdraw the case voluntarily.

When the agency ignored our invitation, we filed a motion to dismiss its lawsuit based on the flawed filings. The judge not only granted our motion, but he also chastised the agency for ignoring our invitations to resolve this without involving the court.

Because our litigation of the motion unnecessarily required our client to incur legal fees, we then filed a request that the judge order the agency to pay our client’s fees. Just as vigorously as it had fought our first motion, the agency fought that request. The judge awarded our client legal fees not only for the motion to dismiss, but also for having to fight its fee request.

In the end, we resolved the dispute in an out-of-court settlement on terms favorable to our client.


Domain Name Seizure Reversed, Favorable Settlement Gained

Ifrah Law’s client, a Russian corporation, was charged in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia with violating the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC) Act.

The company is comprised of a group of financial and investment companies that provide
online trading services. The government alleged that the defendants operated a foreign
currency exchange business over the Internet, which served U.S. customers but did not
register with the CFTC, as is required by law. The government was seeking $280,000 in
potential fines and the worldwide shutdown of the lucrative web site.

After the government obtained a default judgment against the defendant, they turned to
Ifrah Law. With our representation and expertise in financial matters, the case was settled
for a small fine and the web site remains operable outside of the United States.

(CFTC v. InstaForex, Case No. 1:11-cv-00188 (U.S. District Court, District of Columbia))


A Favorable Settlement for an Online Merchant

A dispute arose between an e-commerce merchant and an interactive advertising agency
involving over $2.5 million in damages. The merchant retained Ifrah Law and we utilized
our experience representing individuals and corporations in the online marketing arena to
negotiate a favorable settlement for the e-commerce merchant and obtain a dismissal of
the case.

The ad agency was a large network that rolled out a sales campaign for the merchant’s
product. They claimed they were owed commissions from the merchant’s sales and
brought a case against our client and sued the individuals associated with the company, as

We argued that they you couldn’t assess liability against individuals for the liability of
the company unless there was a specific basis to do so and we moved to dismiss. The
advertising agency challenged us, and we won a judgment for the plaintiff as well as for
our attorney fees.

Then the advertising agency litigated that result – and lost. The judge found our legal fees
to be fair and reasonable.

By the time this wrangling was completed, Ifrah had won a judgment of $250,000 before
the actual case had even started. Normally, it’s impossible for a defendant to win legal
fees – but not with Ifrah Law.


Successfully Defending a Government Contractor Against a Terminated Employee’s Health Care Claim

Ifrah Law successfully defended a government contractor against claims by a terminated company employee. Our client, a health care professional supplier, faced allegations that it failed to offer the former employee COBRA insurance coverage, as required under the COBRA statute.

Ifrah Law conducted a bench trial in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in January 2012. The judge sustained minimal claims and awarded the plaintiff a mere $500.

(Middlebrooks v. Godwin Corporation, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, No. 1:10CV1306))


DC Bans the Box Graphic   Criminal defendants face a wide range of consequences for their alleged actions.  The high emotional and financial cost of defending a case may pale in comparison to the personal toll resulting from a conviction and the associated direct consequences including fines, penalties, remuneration, and incarceration. For most offenders, however, the longest-lasting […]

The post DC Bans the Box appeared first on Crime In The Suites.

Read More

$3.5 Million Cactus Juice Settlement Should be a Warning to Advertisers

In this health-conscious age, consumers are always on the lookout for new products which will improve wellness and quality of life.  Marketers attuned to this trend may be tempted to increase sales by extolling the virtues of their products, even if health claims are unsubstantiated by scientific testing.  A recent FTC case, however, demonstrates the […]

Read More

FTC Sends Message: Make Your Mobile App Secure

Mobile payments have become so commonplace that consumers rarely stop to think about whether their online payment is secure. Mobile app developers can fall into a similar trap of assuming that the necessary security measures are enabled without performing the necessary audits to assure security on a regular basis. A recent settlement between the FTC […]

Read More

Can Violating Social Media Terms of Use Make You Guilty of Violating the CFAA?

LinkedIn has filed a suit against John Does in response to a spate of “data scraping” perpetrated by unknown individuals, in violation of the website’s terms and conditions.This is the latest federal case in the Northern District of California in which a tech company seeks to enforce its contractual provisions through the criminal statute Computer […]

The post Can Violating Social Media Terms of Use Make You Guilty of Violating the CFAA? appeared first on Crime In The Suites.

Read More

Federal Government Blocks International Online Gamblers, Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes Sue

The Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes have filed suit against Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell after the Department Interior blocked their effort to offer real-money online gaming to international customers. The Tribes were prepared to launch after coming to a revenue-sharing agreement with the state of Oklahoma.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, […]

The post Federal Government Blocks International Online Gamblers, Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes Sue appeared first on Crime In The Suites.

Read More

Information on is for general use and is not intended as legal advice. Sending an e-mail through this Web site, and receipt of same, does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Information sent via e-mail is not considered confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. By sending this e-mail, you confirm that you have read, understand and agree to this notice.

Accept Cancel

Video (Popup)