Federal Sentencing: A Longer Sentence For Post-Conviction Comments to the Press?

Federal Sentencing: A Longer Sentence For Post-Conviction Comments to the Press?

August 2, 2010

Federal Sentencing: A Longer Sentence For Post-Conviction Comments to the Press?

By: Ifrah Law

Lynne Stewart, an attorney who was convicted in 2005 of providing material support to a terrorist group by passing messages to and from her imprisoned client, Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, to his followers, was re-sentenced last month by U.S. District Judge John Koeltl in the Southern District of New York to 10 years in prison, far more than observers expected.
But most surprising was the fact that Koeltl based the longer sentence in part on Stewart’s post-sentencing comments in 2006, particularly a comment on TV that she would “not do anything differently” and a statement to the press that she could do a 28-month prison term, the original sentence, “standing on my head.” The judge said this showed a lack of remorse.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit had told Koeltl to try again and to give Stewart a longer sentence than the 28 months he originally specified. The court said sentencing enhancements for terrorism, perjury, and Stewart’s abuse of her position of trust as a lawyer should be applied.
Still, there doesn’t appear to be any legal basis for using post-sentencing comments by the defendant, however unrepentant, to tack on more prison time. The facts in Stewart’s case are not attractive – she was convicted of assisting terrorism by smuggling information, under the cloak of her legal advice, from her client to violent followers in Egypt – but that is no reason for judges to use inappropriate bases for adding to a sentence.
If Stewart’s attorneys try to challenge the sentence in another appeal, however, it’s very likely that they would gain nothing. Even if the 2nd Circuit found that Koeltl used an inappropriate basis for enhancing the sentence, it remains within the Sentencing Guidelines, and on remand he would simply impose the same 10-year sentence and give different, legally acceptable reasons.

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Posts
How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power
White-Collar Crimes |
Dec 6, 2024

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

By: James Trusty
The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing
White-Collar Crimes |
Jun 3, 2024

The Challenging Terrain of White-Collar Sentencing

By: James Trusty
Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?
White-Collar Crimes |
Apr 16, 2024

Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?

By: Abbey Block
Was FTX Collapse as Bad as Enron? In sentencing SBF, Judge Kaplan Says Yes
White-Collar Crimes |
Apr 1, 2024

Was FTX Collapse as Bad as Enron? In sentencing SBF, Judge Kaplan Says Yes

By: Jeffrey Hamlin

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights