Md. Case: An Issue of Medical Judgment or Criminal Fraud?

Md. Case: An Issue of Medical Judgment or Criminal Fraud?

September 3, 2010

Md. Case: An Issue of Medical Judgment or Criminal Fraud?

By: Ifrah Law

On September 1, 2010, John R. McLean, a former cardiologist based in Salisbury, Md., was indicted by a federal grand jury for health care fraud and for making false statements to Medicare and Medicaid.

McLean is charged with performing operations to insert stents – devices to treat coronary disease – in the arteries of patients who did not need them according to accepted medical practice, and then falsifying their medical records to make it appear that they did need them. He lost his hospital privileges in 2007 after a hospital probe of his practices involving stents.

Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance won’t pay for a stent unless the patient has been diagnosed with a 70 percent or greater blockage of the artery. The indictment alleges that McLean inserted stents in patients with significantly less blockage but falsely stated that they were at the 70 percent level or above. Stents and the follow-up appointments and tests can be lucrative for a cardiologist, and the indictment says that McLean benefited from unnecessary stents to the tune of $519,000.

Prosecutors say it’s all about McLean receiving cash that he wasn’t entitled to.

The indictment says McLean engaged in a “scheme and artifice to defraud” Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers – specifically, by obtaining money based on “false and fraudulent pretenses.”

“We do not bring federal prosecutions for discretionary judgments about which reasonable medical professionals might disagree,” Rod Rosenstein, the U.S. attorney for Maryland, said in announcing the indictment.

We don’t condone falsifying medical records. But many doctors seem to think that stents can be helpful to patients even well below the 70 percent level of blockage, and no one has said that McLean’s patients died at higher rates or tended to have worse medical outcomes.

In our view, hospitals themselves are the best equipped to police doctors who aren’t following the rules, and prosecutors should be careful that they don’t make a disagreement over medical procedures into a federal criminal case.

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law operates at the cutting edge of technology, innovation, and regulation. Our lawyers represent iGaming industry clients throughout the entire business cycle, from the formation of a corporation or licensing relationship, through marketing, partnerships, growth, and disputes, to profitable exits.

Related Practice(s)
Other Posts
Massachusetts Cracks Down on Gambling at Internet Cafes
White-Collar Crimes |
Jul 15, 2011

Massachusetts Cracks Down on Gambling at Internet Cafes

By: Ifrah Law
Feds Should Think Twice About Regulating For-Profit Colleges
White-Collar Crimes |
Jul 13, 2011

Feds Should Think Twice About Regulating For-Profit Colleges

By: Ifrah Law
New Guidelines Expand FBI’s Powers to Abuse Citizens’ Freedom
White-Collar Crimes |
Jul 7, 2011

New Guidelines Expand FBI’s Powers to Abuse Citizens’ Freedom

By: Ifrah Law
Good-Faith Rule Applies to Document Destruction
White-Collar Crimes |
Jun 20, 2011

Good-Faith Rule Applies to Document Destruction

By: Ifrah Law

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights