Kentucky Supreme Court Considers Poker

Kentucky Supreme Court Considers Poker

November 2, 2009

Kentucky Supreme Court Considers Poker

By: Ifrah Law

On October 22, 2009, the Supreme Court of Kentucky heard oral arguments in the above referenced case. The case originated when the Commonwealth of Kentucky filed civil seizure and forfeiture proceedings against 141 domain names – virtually all of which offered or involved internet gaming. The Commonwealth contended that domain names constitute gambling devices under state law and as such were subject to seizure under state law. The trial court granted the Commonwealth’s request to seize the sites and scheduled a forfeiture hearing.  The 141 sites, lead by both iMega and the Interactive Gaming Council, halted the forfeiture proceeding by filing a Writ of Prohibition with the Kentucky Court of Appeals.  The Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 ruling, held that a domain name was not a gambling device subject to seizure under Kentucky law.  The Commonwealth appealed to the Supreme Court.  The seven justices hearing the case raised questions that cut across issues beyond the narrow ruling of the Court of Appeals, including the propriety of the Commonwealth’s actions, the nature of jurisdiction over domain names registered outside of Kentucky and the legality of internet gaming.  The Commonwealth appeared unprepared for questions from the Court involving a recent Supreme Court of Arizona case which held (not surprisingly) that in rem jurisdiction requires the presence of the res in the state before jurisdiction will issue.  In its holding, the Arizona court reversed a prior Court of Appeals ruling to the contrary – a Court of Appeals case that the Commonwealth had relied on at every stage of the Kentucky proceedings. Despite the Supplemental Authority filing alerting the Court and the Commonwealth to the Arizona Supreme Court case, counsel for the Commonwealth stated he had neither seen the filing nor been made aware of the critical reversal by the Arizona Court.  The Kentucky Supreme Court is expected to rule on this issue of first impression in the next few months.

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Cases + Rulings Posts
D.C. Becomes First Place in U.S. to Legalize Online Poker
Ifrah on iGaming |
Jan 28, 2022

D.C. Becomes First Place in U.S. to Legalize Online Poker

By: Ifrah Law
Uses and Abuses of Decentralization in Gambling
Ifrah on iGaming |
Dec 7, 2021

Uses and Abuses of Decentralization in Gambling

By: Jake Gray
Mobile Gaming is Now Mobile
Ifrah on iGaming |
Oct 25, 2021

Mobile Gaming is Now Mobile

By: James Trusty
Shaken to the Core
Ifrah on iGaming |
Sep 26, 2021

Shaken to the Core

By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights