Casino fortune cards game of chance, close up.

NASPL Responds to the DOJ Reversal of Opinion

NASPL Responds to the DOJ Reversal of Opinion

February 5, 2019

NASPL Responds to the DOJ Reversal of Opinion

By: Ifrah Law

On February 4, 2019, the North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries (“NASPL”) issued a statement responding to the Department of Justice’s January 14, 2019, opinion regarding the Wire Act of 1961.  In its statement, the NASPL hints that the DOJ failed to consider the effects its latest Wire Act opinion would have on state lotteries.

The NASPL is a non-profit trade association that represents the 52 state and provincial lottery jurisdictions throughout North America.  Every year, U.S. lotteries bring in over $23 billion to support worthy causes within their jurisdictions ranging from economic development to education.  That the DOJ’s new interpretation of the Wire Act threatens U.S. lottery systems means that states and territories face losing big money for these programs.

In its statement, NASPL first points out that the 2011 DOJ opinion regarding the Wire Act – which stated that the Wire Act only prohibited interstate sports wagering – set in motion efforts by the various states and territories to improve their lottery infrastructure, sales, and customer service.  Specifically, certain efforts were made to integrate more modern technology to create a better customer experience.  Such technology was far outside the purview of the drafters of the original Wire Act.

NASPL’s statement continues in pointing out that these infrastructure improvements have “brought in tens of billions of dollars in revenue to good causes throughout the country” and have “increased transaction transparency and efficiency.”  In other words, more people are playing the lottery due to the technologically-improved customer experience.

The DOJ’s reinterpretation of the Wire Act is posed to threaten the lotteries’ successes because it puts these technologically-enhanced lottery transactions in a legal “grey area.”  A further consequence of the DOJ’s reinterpretation is that the related contracts and the industry’s ability to provide much-needed funding for public interests are at risk.

The tone of the statement is conciliatory, however, with NASPL and the lottery industry extending an olive branch to DOJ.  The industry has offered “to work immediately with the DOJ to assist in the understanding and resolution of satisfactory solutions for the confluence of technology, policy and law now described in the DOJ’s opinion reversal issued January 14, 2019.”

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Cases + Rulings Posts
An Epic Fail: Complaint Against Fortnite Creator Based On Facts As Stale As Fruitcake
Ifrah on iGaming |
Mar 5, 2019

An Epic Fail: Complaint Against Fortnite Creator Based On Facts As Stale As Fruitcake

By: Nicole Kardell
Ruling in Daniels v. FanDuel Highlights the Value of Sports Data and Contemporary Culture
Ifrah on iGaming |
Oct 29, 2018

Ruling in Daniels v. FanDuel Highlights the Value of Sports Data and Contemporary Culture

By: Nicole Kardell
Ifrah Law Article on SCOTUS Sports Betting Decision in George Washington Law Review
Ifrah on iGaming |
May 30, 2018

Ifrah Law Article on SCOTUS Sports Betting Decision in George Washington Law Review

By: Jeff Ifrah
Ifrah’s David Yellin Takes on Noted Attorney Paul Clement on Legality of PASPA
Ifrah on iGaming |
Oct 26, 2017

Ifrah’s David Yellin Takes on Noted Attorney Paul Clement on Legality of PASPA

By: Ifrah Law

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights