James M. Trusty

MEMBER

"I think my clients appreciate my judgment, work ethic, and top-level advocacy in front of key executive and judicial decision makers."

Overview

After 27 years as a prosecutor, James (“Jim”) Trusty brings to Ifrah Law extensive experience in complex, multi-district white collar litigation, especially in matters involving RICO, The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986.

As the federal government continues to apply increasingly broad interpretations of these statutes in its investigations and prosecutions of white collar defendants, corporations and individuals can face the threat of exponentially higher monetary penalties and added jail time. To clients defending against such allegations, Jim offers the insider’s view on how federal cases are built, investigations pursued, and settlements negotiated. Ranked by Chambers USA as one of America’s leading lawyers for litigation in White-Collar Crime and Government Investigations, the publication notes, “Former prosecutor James Trusty offers deep expertise in white-collar litigation….”; and clients told Chambers researchers, “James has a good personality and kept me at ease,” and that he “is a very strong lawyer who can represent anyone and do a great job…. He is smart, sophisticated and dedicated.”

Jim has represented a wide variety of individuals and corporations in the white-collar space. He regularly represents professional athletes, both criminally and civilly, and during 2022 and 2023 he represented President Trump during pre-indictment litigation relating to the Mar-a-Lago and January 6 cases.

Prior to joining Ifrah Law, Jim had a long career in public service, most recently as Chief of the Organized Crime Section at the United States Department of Justice. For seven years, Jim was ultimately responsible for investigating and prosecuting regional, national, and international cases, supervising significant pleadings, and providing strategic and tactical guidance in investigations and multi-defendant trials. In addition to running the RICO Review Unit, which reviewed and approved all criminal RICO cases brought by federal prosecutors, he also was in charge of establishing and promoting policies focused on immigration reform, firearms trafficking, proposed Congressional testimony for DOJ officials, and internet gambling. Significant and sensitive matters on which he worked include the post-conviction review of the Alaska corruption case related to U.S. v. Theodore Stevens and the investigation into allegations of misconduct by a sitting U.S. Attorney and one of her subordinates.

Prior to his work at DOJ, Jim acted as Assistant U.S. Attorney in Greenbelt, Maryland, where he investigated and prosecuted a wide variety of white-collar and other criminal cases, including The Washington area Sniper investigation. He also prosecuted three death penalty cases and was a member of the Attorney General’s Capital Review Committee, responsible for assessing capital-eligible cases such as the Boston Marathon Bomber and the Charleston Church massacre.

In 2018, Jim was appointed by the Governor of Maryland to serve on The Task Force to Study Maryland’s Criminal Gang Statutes. The Task Force assessed the efficacy of existing state laws as they apply to gang-related criminal activity in the state and presented its  findings and recommendations to the Governor.

Jim regularly speaks at conferences, seminars, and training sessions on topics related to complex litigation and criminal law. In addition to numerous pro bono projects, Jim coached several Mock Trial teams at American University’s Washington College of Law, and he teaches criminal justice courses at the University of Maryland. He also regularly provides commentary for major television networks such as Fox News, CNN, and NewsNation, as well as digital and print media outlets. Jim has been awarded numerous honors over the course of his career including the Attorney General’s Distinguished Service Award, Federal Prosecutor of the Year, Community Prosecuting Award, and the Child Abuse Protection Award, to name only a few.

READ MORE +

Awards + Recognitions

  • Chambers USA, Litigation: White Collar Crime and Government Investigations (District of Columbia), 2022-2025
  • Attorney General’s Distinguished Service Award, 2011
  • ATF Honors Award, 2010
  • Baltimore SAC Award (ICE), 2009
  • Assistant Attorney General’s Award (MS-13), 2007
  • Project Safe Neighborhood Gang Prosecution Award, 2007
  • Project Safe Neighborhood Innovative Practices Award, 2007
  • FLEOA National Award for Investigative Excellence, 2007
  • Federal Prosecutor of the Year, Montgomery County Police, 2005

Credentials

Education
  • J.D., Emory University School of Law, 1989
  • B.A., Economics, Wake Forest University, 1986 (cum laude)

Admitted to Practice
  • District of Columbia
  • Maryland

Previous Experience
  • Department of Justice, Chief of Organized Crime & Gang Section
  • U.S. Attorneys Office, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Maryland

Professional Community
  • Task Force to Study Maryland’s Criminal Gang Statutes – Appointed by Governor of Maryland, 2018

Jim's Insights

Flirting with Disaster: Kid Glove Treatment of an Assassination Attempt Sets Damaging Example
White-Collar Crimes |
Oct 6, 2025

Flirting with Disaster: Kid Glove Treatment of an Assassination Attempt Sets Damaging Example

By: James Trusty
Caught Red Handed, But What is Pete Rose’s Crime?
Ifrah on iGaming |
Sep 10, 2025

Caught Red Handed, But What is Pete Rose’s Crime?

By: James Trusty
The Referral was the Easy Part – Where does Gabbard’s Evidence Lead DOJ?
White-Collar Crimes |
Jul 29, 2025

The Referral was the Easy Part – Where does Gabbard’s Evidence Lead DOJ?

By: James Trusty
Baltimoronic Investigation
White-Collar Crimes |
Jul 8, 2025

Baltimoronic Investigation

By: James Trusty

Case Studies

Ifrah Secures Release for International Client Jailed for Alleged Arms Control Violations

When an international businessman was taken into custody at the U.S.-Canada border and jailed for four months without bail, the Ifrah team was brought in to challenge the government.

A businessman from a prominent political family in Pakistan was indicted for violations of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), statutes traditionally used against professional exporters seeking to evade licensing requirements so the government does not detect their efforts to sell state secrets or military-grade weaponry to parties and governments with anti-U.S. sentiments. He was also charged with making false statements about his intended use for legally purchased firearm accessories because he was not only an avid hunter but a licensed firearms retailer in his home country. Ifrah Law attorneys quickly filed a number of ground-breaking motions on our client’s behalf. One of the motions also sought bail for the client based on the weakness of the government’s case and notwithstanding the existence of an ICE detainer, a status which usually eliminates the possibility of release.

The Court expressed concern about the government’s ability to meet its burden of proof, and strong displeasure with the government’s case: “(T)he older I get,… the more distressed I am about the inability of government authorities to exercise common sense and practicality…. (W)e’re all in this together under one of the most sacred documents in our whole concept of jurisprudence, the Constitution of the United States, to treat people fairly and justly, not to win at any cost or put the screws to somebody so we can put the screws to them.”

After the defense investigation uncovered that U.S. law enforcement had destroyed physical evidence, the Court granted bail and ultimately the U.S. Attorney agreed to dismiss the IEEPA and AECA charges. Our client chose to plead guilty to the false statement charge and a sentence of time served in order to go home immediately. He had been in jail and away from his family for nine months, during which time he missed the birth of his first child.

Well-crafted motions and aggressive investigation led to the extremely rare circumstance of a foreign citizen charged with weapons violations being released from pretrial detention, and the ultimate dismissal of the more substantial felonies in the case.

(United States v. Durrani, No. 1:17-cr-00024 (W.D.N.Y))

Read Case Study +