In 2016- Who Will (Finally) Say Yes To Regulated Online Gaming?

In 2016- Who Will (Finally) Say Yes To Regulated Online Gaming?

In 2016- Who Will (Finally) Say Yes To Regulated Online Gaming?

January 20, 2016

In 2016- Who Will (Finally) Say Yes To Regulated Online Gaming?

By: Ifrah Law

*This article first appeared in the January 2016 issue of eGR North America Magazine 

Pennsylvania is the most likely, and has been making slow but relatively steady progress since it commissioned a study into online gaming back in 2014. Since then, several bills have been introduced.

Efforts have stalled, but not as in other jurisdictions where delays are based on moral outrage, a lack of political will, or opposition from powerful land-based operators. Pennsylvanian lawmakers have been mired in details. Most recently Rep. John Payne introduced HB 649, which would see additional revenues from egaming used for structural deficits in the state’s pension plan. Legislators showed considerable interest in and sup- port for the bill, but progress halted in the summer session.

Some lawmakers proposed that online gaming revenues be used to fund the budget. Ultimately, that proposal was rejected in part because it would leave the pension deficit unaddressed. Now the bill is back on track.

In November 2015, the Pennsylvania House Gaming Oversight Committee voted to send the bill to the House floor. We predict legislators will pass the bill in 2016.

Massachusetts is a close second. The Bay State appears to have more momentum than we have seen elsewhere. Chairman Stephen Crosby says the Gaming Commission will soon complete its analysis of online gambling and submit findings to the legislature.

State Attorney General Maura Healey proposed regulations for daily fantasy sports (DFS), considered a lawful game of skill. These signs are encouraging, but the introduction of legislation will be the first step in a long process.

In our view, California will eventually enact online gaming legislation, but is hindered by a super-majority voting requirement for budget-related legislation and political opposition, particularly at the farthest ends of the spectrum. California is also home to powerful stakeholders with competing views on online gaming. We believe that, absent a material change, we do not expect California to legalize online gaming in 2016.

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law

Ifrah Law is a passionate team of experts that understands the importance of listening to and addressing specific concerns of clients – when facing the heat of a federal investigation or the ire of a business competitor. Experience in complex cases related to online gambling and sports betting, internet marking and advertising, and white collar litigation.

Related Practice(s)
Other Sports Posts
Sports Betting Advertisement Numbers Actually Decreasing
Ifrah on iGaming |
May 2, 2024

Sports Betting Advertisement Numbers Actually Decreasing

By: Jordan Briggs
Ohtani-Mizuhara Scandal: A Case for Regulated Sports Betting, Not Against It
Ifrah on iGaming |
Apr 11, 2024

Ohtani-Mizuhara Scandal: A Case for Regulated Sports Betting, Not Against It

By: Jake Gray
Say it Ain’t So, Oh!
Ifrah on iGaming |
Apr 3, 2024

Say it Ain’t So, Oh!

By: James Trusty
A Positive Result of Legalized Sports Betting is Solution for Betting Corruption and Match Fixing
Ifrah on iGaming |
Mar 26, 2024

A Positive Result of Legalized Sports Betting is Solution for Betting Corruption and Match Fixing

By: Sara Dalsheim

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights