Insights < BACK TO ALL INSIGHTS
Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?
FEATURED
December 12, 2025
Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?
By: Lauren Scribner
The “influencer economy,” in which so-called “content creators” share user-generated content such as livestreams or short-form film, is showing no signs of slowing down. Currently valued north of $250 billion, it is projected to reach nearly $500 billion by 2027.[1] “Creators earn income primarily through direct branding deals to pitch products as an influencer; via a share of advertising revenues with the host platform; and through subscriptions, donations and other forms of direct payment from followers. Brand deals are the main source of revenue at about 70%, according to survey data.[2] Indeed, a recent survey indicates that 64% of consumers are “more willing” to purchase a product when it is marketed by their favorite influencer.[3] And “9 in 10 marketers…
What are you looking for?
The SEC Signs on to Arbitration
September 29, 2025
The SEC Signs on to Arbitration
By: George Calhoun
Early last week, on September 17, 2025, the SEC announced that it will no longer consider the presence of a mandatory arbitration provision in a company’s charter or bylaws when deciding whether to accelerate the effectiveness of a registration statement. This policy shift will permit companies to include arbitration clauses in their governing documents to require securities litigants (including class action plaintiffs) to pursue their…
Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule
August 19, 2025
Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule
By: Robert Ward
California law has often tested just how much room the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) leaves for states to regulate consumer arbitration agreements. Last week, in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court,[1] the California Supreme Court determined that at least one claimant-favoring provision of the California Arbitration Act (CAA), California Code of Civil Procedure § 1281.98 comes close to, but does not cross, that line. At the same…
Schrems II Screams: CJEU Decision Puts Companies in Tailspin Over EU-US Data Transfers
July 17, 2020
Schrems II Screams: CJEU Decision Puts Companies in Tailspin Over EU-US Data Transfers
By: Nicole Kardell
The privacy world is abuzz about the European Court of Justice’s July 16, 2020 decision in Schrems II: Europe’s highest court invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield framework. The Privacy Shield provides a streamlined mechanism to facilitate personal data transfers from Europe to the U.S. It was implemented in 2016 following the invalidation of an earlier “safe harbor” system. Europe deems the U.S. to have insufficient…
Upcoming Supreme Court cases could stop FTC from halting businesses and freezing assets via TROs
July 16, 2020
Upcoming Supreme Court cases could stop FTC from halting businesses and freezing assets via TROs
By: Ifrah Law
If it was not already apparent, the Supreme Court last week made it clear that it is taking a close look at the power of federal agencies to obtain monetary relief such as disgorgement or restitution through civil proceedings. Indeed, on June 22, the Court in Liu v. Securities and Exchange Commission held that although the SEC had the power to obtain disgorgement in civil…
FTC Settles with Gaming App for False Representations about Children’s Privacy
July 9, 2020
FTC Settles with Gaming App for False Representations about Children’s Privacy
By: Nicole Kardell
On July 6, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement with gaming app developer Miniclip S.A. The settlement addresses allegations that Miniclip falsely claimed membership in a Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) safe harbor program for the last several years. Miniclip boasts more than 1 billion downloads of its 45 “high-quality mobile games” (such as Agar.io and Soccer Stars) and a further catalogue…
Supreme Court Finds That CFPB Director Can Be Removed By President, But Allows Agency To Continue To Operate
June 29, 2020
Supreme Court Finds That CFPB Director Can Be Removed By President, But Allows Agency To Continue To Operate
By: Ifrah Law
On June 29, 2020, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that expanded the President’s authority to remove a director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), while simultaneously finding that the Bureau itself could continue to exist an operate. In Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, both the law firm Seila Law—which was under investigation by the CFPB for charging consumers with improper fees in association…
FTC Enforcement reminds Companies to live up their Promises
April 15, 2020
FTC Enforcement reminds Companies to live up their Promises
By: Nicole Kardell
The FTC recently announced its settlement with Tapplock, Inc., a maker of smart padlocks (Internet-connected fingerprint-enabled padlocks that you can use in lieu of old-fashioned combo locks). The FTC investigated the Canadian-based company for its allegedly false claims that its Internet-connected smart locks were designed to be “unbreakable” and that the company took reasonable steps to secure the data that it collected from consumers. According…
