Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

December 12, 2025

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

By: Lauren Scribner

The “influencer economy,” in which so-called “content creators” share user-generated content such as livestreams or short-form film, is showing no signs of slowing down.  Currently valued north of $250 billion, it is projected to reach nearly $500 billion by 2027.[1] “Creators earn income primarily through direct branding deals to pitch products as an influencer; via a share of advertising revenues with the host platform; and through subscriptions, donations and other forms of direct payment from followers.  Brand deals are the main source of revenue at about 70%, according to survey data.[2] Indeed, a recent survey indicates that 64% of consumers are “more willing” to purchase a product when it is marketed by their favorite influencer.[3]  And “9 in 10 marketers…

Read More about Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

September 29, 2025

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

By: George Calhoun

Early last week, on September 17, 2025, the SEC announced that it will no longer consider the presence of a mandatory arbitration provision in a company’s charter or bylaws when deciding whether to accelerate the effectiveness of a registration statement.  This policy shift will permit companies to include arbitration clauses in their governing documents to require securities litigants (including class action plaintiffs) to pursue their…

Read More about The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

August 19, 2025

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

By: Robert Ward

California law has often tested just how much room the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) leaves for states to regulate consumer arbitration agreements. Last week, in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court,[1] the California Supreme Court determined that at least one claimant-favoring provision of the California Arbitration Act (CAA), California Code of Civil Procedure § 1281.98 comes close to, but does not cross, that line. At the same…

Read More about Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

Google Agrees to Forfeit $500 Million: What Does This Mean for Affiliate Marketers?

August 29, 2011

Google Agrees to Forfeit $500 Million: What Does This Mean for Affiliate Marketers?

By: Jeff Ifrah

In an unusual and little-noticed recent settlement, Google Inc. has agreed to pay a forfeiture of $500 million because it permitted Canadian pharmacies to advertise to United States consumers on its site using Google AdWords, resulting in the illegal sale of prescription drugs through online channels into the United States between 2003 and 2009. The U.S. Department of Justice announced this agreement on August 24,…

Read More about Google Agrees to Forfeit $500 Million: What Does This Mean for Affiliate Marketers?

What Priorities Will FTC Stress in Its Impending Online Advertising Guidelines?

August 21, 2011

What Priorities Will FTC Stress in Its Impending Online Advertising Guidelines?

By: Nicole Kardell

If you advertise or sell over the Internet, be aware that changes are afoot at the FTC that will affect your business. The Commission is in the midst of revamping its Dot Com Disclosures, guidelines it prepared back in 2000 regarding online advertising. It issued a request for public comment on prospective revisions in late May. Now that the comment period has ended in early…

Read More about What Priorities Will FTC Stress in Its Impending Online Advertising Guidelines?

FTC’s Mortgage Acts and Practices Advertising Rule May Not Help Consumers

August 15, 2011

FTC’s Mortgage Acts and Practices Advertising Rule May Not Help Consumers

By: Nicole Kardell

The FTC recently issued the Mortgage Acts and Practices – Advertising Final Rule. This rule is the FTC’s response to a congressional directive to address unfair or deceptive acts in the mortgage loan industry. Briefly, the MAP Rule (1) gives the FTC and state authorities the ability to seek civil penalties for deceptive mortgage advertising, (2) clarifies and provides examples of what constitutes deceptive mortgage…

Read More about FTC’s Mortgage Acts and Practices Advertising Rule May Not Help Consumers

Should FTC Sue Law Schools For Misrepresentation?

July 11, 2011

Should FTC Sue Law Schools For Misrepresentation?

By: Jeff Ifrah

On May 25, 2011, a class action was filed against the Thomas Jefferson School of Law (TJSL) in San Diego for intentionally misrepresenting employment data of recent alumni. The complaint states that in order to continue attracting students despite exorbitant law student debt and a depleted legal job market, TJSL has “adopted a practice of misrepresenting its post-graduation employment statistics.” These facts aren’t unique. According…

Read More about Should FTC Sue Law Schools For Misrepresentation?

Internet Affiliates Fight Back in Court Against Illinois Retail Tax

June 30, 2011

Internet Affiliates Fight Back in Court Against Illinois Retail Tax

By: Ifrah Law

An organization that represents online affiliates filed suit in federal court this month challenging the constitutionality of a new Illinois law targeted at collecting sales tax from Web retailers. Internet retail giant Amazon.com has threatened to cut off its marketing affiliates in Illinois in an effort to avoid paying the tax, and other companies are threatening similar action. We have previously examined the potential effects…

Read More about Internet Affiliates Fight Back in Court Against Illinois Retail Tax

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?
By: Lauren Scribner

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration
By: George Calhoun

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule
By: Robert Ward

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights