Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

December 12, 2025

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

By: Lauren Scribner

The “influencer economy,” in which so-called “content creators” share user-generated content such as livestreams or short-form film, is showing no signs of slowing down.  Currently valued north of $250 billion, it is projected to reach nearly $500 billion by 2027.[1] “Creators earn income primarily through direct branding deals to pitch products as an influencer; via a share of advertising revenues with the host platform; and through subscriptions, donations and other forms of direct payment from followers.  Brand deals are the main source of revenue at about 70%, according to survey data.[2] Indeed, a recent survey indicates that 64% of consumers are “more willing” to purchase a product when it is marketed by their favorite influencer.[3]  And “9 in 10 marketers…

Read More about Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

September 29, 2025

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

By: George Calhoun

Early last week, on September 17, 2025, the SEC announced that it will no longer consider the presence of a mandatory arbitration provision in a company’s charter or bylaws when deciding whether to accelerate the effectiveness of a registration statement.  This policy shift will permit companies to include arbitration clauses in their governing documents to require securities litigants (including class action plaintiffs) to pursue their…

Read More about The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

August 19, 2025

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

By: Robert Ward

California law has often tested just how much room the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) leaves for states to regulate consumer arbitration agreements. Last week, in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court,[1] the California Supreme Court determined that at least one claimant-favoring provision of the California Arbitration Act (CAA), California Code of Civil Procedure § 1281.98 comes close to, but does not cross, that line. At the same…

Read More about Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

Wells Fargo Learns That Recording Calls In California Can Be Costly

April 5, 2016

Wells Fargo Learns That Recording Calls In California Can Be Costly

By: Michelle Cohen

In the past few years, many organizations such as Capital One, Bass Pro Outdoor, and the Cosmopolitan Hotel have faced class actions alleging violations of California’s call recording law.  This week, California’s Attorney General demonstrated that her office, working with state prosecutors, will also vigorously enforce the law under the state’s criminal statutes.  Attorney General Harris announced an $8.5 million dollar settlement with Wells Fargo…

Read More about Wells Fargo Learns That Recording Calls In California Can Be Costly

Arbitration Under Fire: Brace Your Company for Less Contract Freedom and More Class Actions

March 31, 2016

Arbitration Under Fire: Brace Your Company for Less Contract Freedom and More Class Actions

By: George Calhoun

Since the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) of 1925, the United States has had a policy preference for arbitration, even when an arbitration provision includes language barring class action litigation.  We saw this most recently in December 2015 when the Supreme Court reversed a decision by a California Court of Appeal to invalidate a class-arbitration waiver within a service agreement between DirecTV and its customers.[1]  But…

Read More about Arbitration Under Fire: Brace Your Company for Less Contract Freedom and More Class Actions

To Refer, Or Not To Refer? OIG’s Outdated Health Care Referral Restrictions

March 21, 2016

To Refer, Or Not To Refer? OIG’s Outdated Health Care Referral Restrictions

By: Drew Barnholtz

The Office of the Inspector General, which enforces Health and Human Services, has long been averse to referral services that don’t meet certain criteria.  To get protection against a possible enforcement action, the referral service can’t exclude anyone from participating in the service, and payments for referrals have to be reasonable and cannot be tied to the volume or value of the referrals that are…

Read More about To Refer, Or Not To Refer? OIG’s Outdated Health Care Referral Restrictions

Good Lord, & Taylor! Of Course You Need to Disclose Native Ads

March 16, 2016

Good Lord, & Taylor! Of Course You Need to Disclose Native Ads

By: Ifrah Law

On March 15, 2016, national retailer Lord & Taylor agreed to settle FTC charges that it “deceived consumers by paying for native advertisements.” The settlement is the first of its kind following the December 2015 guidance memorandum, Native Advertising: A Guide for Businesses, issued by the FTC. Under the terms of the settlement, Lord & Taylor is prohibited from “misrepresenting that paid ads are from…

Read More about Good Lord, & Taylor! Of Course You Need to Disclose Native Ads

Latest German Sausage? Privacy-Wurst by Facebook

March 10, 2016

Latest German Sausage? Privacy-Wurst by Facebook

By: Ifrah Law

Despite not being explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, the Supreme Court has firmly held that a right to privacy for all Americans is found in several amendments to the Constitution, with almost 100 years of case law providing precedent for many personal privacy rights that have become a cornerstone of American culture. However, in this new digital age of rapid technology change, with real-time access…

Read More about Latest German Sausage? Privacy-Wurst by Facebook

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?

Influencer Liability: Will New-Age Litigation Net Celebrity Spokespeople?
By: Lauren Scribner

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration

The SEC Signs on to Arbitration
By: George Calhoun

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule

Cal. High Court Softens Draconian Arbitration Fee Rule
By: Robert Ward

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights