Key and handcuffs

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

December 6, 2024

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

By: James Trusty

As the presiding judge scolded Hunter Biden’s attorneys this week, “The Constitution provides the President with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1, but nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history.”[1]  But what exactly is that history he claims is being re-written? Judge Scarsi was challenging the largely academic issue of whether a pardon signed at noon, for instance, protects against crimes committed on the same day at dinnertime. That is a very limited run at the notion of “preemptive” pardons, and it seems to be strictly a question of chronology. The judge did not seem to question the idea of…

Read More about How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

Supremely Improbable

July 30, 2024

Supremely Improbable

By: James Trusty

President Biden’s pronounced objectives for Supreme Court “reform” are improbable, politically lifeless under a particularly lame duck presidency, and motivated by transparently November-driven calculations. But even if the proposed changes are doomed from the start, they push public discourse on a couple of issues that are red meat for the democrats. The stated reforms are superficially simple ones: 1) to “clarify” that “there is no…

Read More about Supremely Improbable

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

July 5, 2024

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

By: James Trusty

The immediate and eventual impact of the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in Trump v. United States is both considerable and dramatically misrepresented. The initial consequences include likely delay to the January 6 prosecution out of D.C. and the setting of hearings—in D.C., Georgia and south Florida—where the judges will be required to make  factual findings as to whether the evidence supporting the indictments reflect “official…

Read More about Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

NY Legalizing Medical Marijuana with the Compassionate Care Act

July 11, 2014

NY Legalizing Medical Marijuana with the Compassionate Care Act

By: Steven Eichorn

Severely ill patients in New York State are celebrating Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s signature of a bill that legalized medical marijuana in New York for many severely ill patients[1]. As noted by Assembly Speaker Silver in his remarks, “With this agreement, we are assuring access to that much-needed relief while ensuring the tightest possible regulation and state supervision.” Indeed, the New York bill does contain many…

Read More about NY Legalizing Medical Marijuana with the Compassionate Care Act

The Right to Remain Silent Does Not Extend to Computer/Phone Passwords

July 8, 2014

The Right to Remain Silent Does Not Extend to Computer/Phone Passwords

By: Ifrah Law

Recently the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that under certain circumstances, a court may compel a criminal defendant to provide the password to encrypted digital evidence without violating the defendant’s constitutional rights. This is an increasingly prevalent issue that has divided courts across the country and may be presented to the United States Supreme Court for review soon. Leon Gelfgatt was indicted in 2010 for…

Read More about The Right to Remain Silent Does Not Extend to Computer/Phone Passwords

U.S. Court of Appeals Decision: Cell Location Data is Protected Under Individual’s Expectation of Privacy

July 2, 2014

U.S. Court of Appeals Decision: Cell Location Data is Protected Under Individual’s Expectation of Privacy

By: Jeffrey Hamlin

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently considered whether cell site location data is protected by the Fourth Amendment. On June 11, 2014, the court issued its decision in favor of privacy rights: the court held that cell site location information is within the cell phone subscriber’s reasonable expectation of privacy. If officers want the data, they must obtain the subscriber’s consent…

Read More about U.S. Court of Appeals Decision: Cell Location Data is Protected Under Individual’s Expectation of Privacy

Court: Police Need Warrant to Search Phone. But Guess What? They Get to Keep Your Phone While They Get One.

June 26, 2014

Court: Police Need Warrant to Search Phone. But Guess What? They Get to Keep Your Phone While They Get One.

By: Jeff Ifrah

Will cops still get access to cell phone data post arrest? You bet. Today’s Supreme Court decision just means they need to get permission from a judge before they start searching who you have been texting. And odds are very good, that permission will be granted. In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the United States Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers…

Read More about Court: Police Need Warrant to Search Phone. But Guess What? They Get to Keep Your Phone While They Get One.

Supreme Court Denies Cert. in New Jersey Sports Betting Case

June 23, 2014

Supreme Court Denies Cert. in New Jersey Sports Betting Case

By: Ifrah Law

Today, the United States Supreme Court denied New Jersey’s petition for a writ of certiorari to hear an appeal from lower court decisions that invalidated its sports wagering law.  This ends a three year fight to bring sports betting to New Jersey’s casinos and racetracks, but NJ State Senator Raymond Lesniak, who has spearheaded efforts to bring sports betting to the state has vowed to…

Read More about Supreme Court Denies Cert. in New Jersey Sports Betting Case

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power
By: James Trusty

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable
By: James Trusty

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury

Presidential Immunity Ruling Stirs Sound and Fury
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights