Illustration of a high school above a gun. Concept illustration of bad occurrence related to shooting in school premises.

Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?

Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?

April 16, 2024

Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?

By: Abbey Block

Can being a bad parent make you a criminal? A jury in Michigan recently answered yes in the case of Jennifer and James Crumbley – the parents of high school mass shooter, Ethan Crumbley. Although neither Mr. nor Mrs. Crumbley fired a single shot during the school shooting that killed four students (and injured six other people), last week they were each sentenced to ten years in prison for involuntary manslaughter. The high school shooting, which took place nearly three years ago in Oxford, Michigan is undoubtedly a horrific tragedy. Nobody questions that the shooter, Ethan, should be punished severely for his actions. Indeed, in 2023, Ethan, who was charged as an adult (despite being fifteen at the time of…

Read More about Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?

Was FTX Collapse as Bad as Enron? In sentencing SBF, Judge Kaplan Says Yes

April 1, 2024

Was FTX Collapse as Bad as Enron? In sentencing SBF, Judge Kaplan Says Yes

By: Jeffrey Hamlin

On Thursday, March 28, 2024, 32-year old Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison for his role in one of the largest financial frauds in U.S. history—a fraud perpetrated through two cryptocurrency entities he founded—FTX and Alameda Research. In late-2023, a jury convicted him on various conspiracy and substantive counts for wire fraud on FTX’s customers, securities fraud on FTX’s customers and investors,…

Read More about Was FTX Collapse as Bad as Enron? In sentencing SBF, Judge Kaplan Says Yes

A Tale of Two Courts

February 16, 2024

A Tale of Two Courts

By: James Trusty

Much has been made of the contemptuous and combustible combination of former President Trump and Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoran, the trial judge in the New York “fraud” case that imperils Trump’s ability to do business in New York. This week we got a glimpse into a different proceeding involving an extremely opinionated subject of an accusation—District Attorney Fanni Willis—presided over by Fulton County…

Read More about A Tale of Two Courts

N.J. Again Passes Online-Poker Bill; Decision Now in Governor’s Hands

December 20, 2012

N.J. Again Passes Online-Poker Bill; Decision Now in Governor’s Hands

By: Ifrah Law

New Jersey could soon become the third state to legalize online gaming within its borders. Its State Senate on December 20, 2012, voted 33-3 to legalize online poker in the state. The General Assembly had previously approved the bill by a vote of 48-25-3. The bill was able to achieve significant bipartisan support in both houses of the state legislature. The bill will now be…

Read More about N.J. Again Passes Online-Poker Bill; Decision Now in Governor’s Hands

Court’s Strict Interpretation of Bank Fraud Law May Rein In Prosecutors

December 11, 2012

Court’s Strict Interpretation of Bank Fraud Law May Rein In Prosecutors

By: Ifrah Law

A recent interpretation of the federal bank fraud statute by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit may prove to be a useful check to overreaching by federal prosecutors, who have tended to use that statute in the past as a catch-all law enforcement tool. In United States v. Nkansah, the Court reviewed the conviction of a defendant for bank fraud and…

Read More about Court’s Strict Interpretation of Bank Fraud Law May Rein In Prosecutors

D.C. Circuit: Restitution Order Must Involve Victim’s Loss, Not Defendant’s Gain

December 5, 2012

D.C. Circuit: Restitution Order Must Involve Victim’s Loss, Not Defendant’s Gain

By: Ifrah Law

On November 9, 2012, in a unanimous opinion in United States v. Fair, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit found that the district court had abused its discretion in ordering restitution in the amount of $743,000 in a criminal copyright infringement case. The appeals court vacated the lower court’s restitution order, finding that the order was based on “a clear legal and…

Read More about D.C. Circuit: Restitution Order Must Involve Victim’s Loss, Not Defendant’s Gain

Are Medicaid Claims Becoming the Next Battleground for FCA Cases?

December 4, 2012

Are Medicaid Claims Becoming the Next Battleground for FCA Cases?

By: Ifrah Law

A qui tam case that was recently dismissed on summary judgment may signal the next front in the legal enforcement war arising from off-label use of prescription medications. In United States ex rel. Watson v. King-Vassel et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the complaint alleged that defendant Dr. Jennifer King-Vassel violated the Federal False Claims Act and…

Read More about Are Medicaid Claims Becoming the Next Battleground for FCA Cases?

New DOJ Guide on FCPA Provides Guidance, Gives Statute a Broad Reading

November 26, 2012

New DOJ Guide on FCPA Provides Guidance, Gives Statute a Broad Reading

By: Ifrah Law

After much uncertainty and discussion, the U.S. Department of Justice has finally issued official guidance regarding who qualifies as a “foreign official” under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). This guidance was published on November 14, 2012, in the Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a broad guide to enforcement and interpretation of the FCPA that the DOJ issued jointly with the…

Read More about New DOJ Guide on FCPA Provides Guidance, Gives Statute a Broad Reading

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?

Punishing the Parent – Should the Parents of a School Shooter Be Criminally Liable for their Parental Failures?
By: Abbey Block

Was FTX Collapse as Bad as Enron? In sentencing SBF, Judge Kaplan Says Yes

Was FTX Collapse as Bad as Enron? In sentencing SBF, Judge Kaplan Says Yes
By: Jeffrey Hamlin

A Tale of Two Courts

A Tale of Two Courts
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights