In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

August 18, 2026

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

By: Robert Ward

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally. Any attorney who has litigated a case against a party proceeding pro se is familiar with the common refrain that courts liberally construe pro se filings.[1] This leniency was not enough for one Connecticut litigant. In a scheme that gives new meaning to the phrase “reading between the lines,” pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot included hidden instructions in his filings with the goal of ensuring any AI model’s output would agree with his position. In doing so, Elliot undertook what appears to be the first confirmed prompt injection attack aimed at an American court. The Attempted Prompt Injection On July 24, 2026, pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot filed what…

Read More about In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

June 29, 2026

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

By: Lauren Scribner

The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), 50 U.S.C. § 4025a, grants military spouses portability of their professional licenses. That means when a military spouse moves with his or her servicemember to the servicemember’s assigned duty station in a new state, the spouse’s professional license essentially moves with them.[1] In order to take advantage of this license portability benefit in the new state, the SCRA requires…

Read More about The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

June 22, 2026

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

By: James Trusty

As any federal criminal practitioner can attest, judges holding a sentencing hearing are privy to an intentionally wider universe of information about the defendant than a jury would have heard about at trial. We want judges to consider all sorts of things about the offender and the offense, beyond just the facts establishing the crime – social background, employment history, criminal record, substance abuse history, mental health issues, and more. Particularly in…

Read More about How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

Journalist Challenges DOJ Subpoena, Claims Reporter’s Privilege

July 20, 2011

Journalist Challenges DOJ Subpoena, Claims Reporter’s Privilege

By: Ifrah Law

James Risen, an investigative journalist for The New York Times, is currently challenging a subpoena issued by the U.S. Department of Justice seeking testimony from him against a CIA agent accused of leaking classified information. The subpoena highlights a trend in which the government attempts to use journalists’ testimony against government employees who reveal information in exchange for anonymity. Risen, citing reporter’s privilege, is seeking…

Read More about Journalist Challenges DOJ Subpoena, Claims Reporter’s Privilege

Massachusetts Cracks Down on Gambling at Internet Cafes

July 15, 2011

Massachusetts Cracks Down on Gambling at Internet Cafes

By: Ifrah Law

Last month, citing evidence that illegal gambling was going on at “Internet cafés” throughout the state, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley issued a new permanent regulation banning gambling at such places. The regulation bans the operation of establishments “where a gambling purpose predominates over the bona fide sale of bona fide goods or services” – in this case, cyber cafés and phone card video game terminals….

Read More about Massachusetts Cracks Down on Gambling at Internet Cafes

Feds Should Think Twice About Regulating For-Profit Colleges

July 13, 2011

Feds Should Think Twice About Regulating For-Profit Colleges

By: Ifrah Law

Business is booming at America’s for-profit colleges. With steady high unemployment rates, many of the job-hungry have opted to pursue higher or specialized degrees in an effort to make themselves more marketable. Pricy for-profit institutions, like the 400,000 strong University of Phoenix, are flourishing with this increased demand as students flock to their courses to invest in new career prospects. But recent regulatory activity at…

Read More about Feds Should Think Twice About Regulating For-Profit Colleges

New Guidelines Expand FBI’s Powers to Abuse Citizens’ Freedom

July 7, 2011

New Guidelines Expand FBI’s Powers to Abuse Citizens’ Freedom

By: Ifrah Law

New updates to the FBI’s agent manual, the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), greatly expand the FBI’s powers to search for information relating to groups or individuals who are not suspected of wrongdoing. The DIOG, which has been described as a collection of procedures, standards, approval levels, and explanations, to be used by FBI agents, was created in 2008 to help implement new Attorney…

Read More about New Guidelines Expand FBI’s Powers to Abuse Citizens’ Freedom

U.K. Juror Gets 8-Month Sentence for Facebook Use

July 5, 2011

U.K. Juror Gets 8-Month Sentence for Facebook Use

By: Ifrah Law

Eight months seems a harsh sentence for a juror who made some ill-considered Facebook posts. Harsh, that is, until you hear the facts. The proceeding against U.K. resident Joanne Fraill is one of the first contempt prosecutions ever against a juror for improper Internet use. And the punishment she received is a reminder that, when pushed, courts have both the power and the will to…

Read More about U.K. Juror Gets 8-Month Sentence for Facebook Use

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.
By: Robert Ward

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families
By: Lauren Scribner

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights