Grand Courtroom of Justice

Judging the Judges

Judging the Judges

October 2, 2026

Judging the Judges

By: Lauren Scribner

Judges are in the business of holding people accountable for crimes and misconduct—but how do we hold judges accountable for their own ethical lapses? Recently, in a moment of frustration, Florida Second Circuit Judge J. Layne Smith told three attorneys practicing in his courtroom that he “would like to tell the deputy to pull his gun and shoot all three of [them] as far as [his] level of frustration right now.”[1] Yes—you read that correctly. A presiding judge vocalized his thought to have attorneys practicing in his courtroom shot by courtroom security. What should the consequence be for using such threatening language? A mere public reprimand and recusal from that case?[2] Or, should there be some sort of tangible punishment?…

Read More about Judging the Judges

Dismissive of Dismissal

September 25, 2026

Dismissive of Dismissal

By: James Trusty

During the two Trump administrations, a trend has begun to emerge of federal judges challenging the once-unrestricted authority of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to dismiss indictments. The longstanding framework of separation of powers suggests this judicial pushback is unsupported activism, but the judges claim the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Rules”) do not relegate their role to rubber stamping. Ultimately, this trajectory may lead…

Read More about Dismissive of Dismissal

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

August 18, 2026

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

By: Robert Ward

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally. Any attorney who has litigated a case against a party proceeding pro se is familiar with the common refrain that courts liberally construe pro se filings.[1] This leniency was not enough for one Connecticut litigant. In a scheme that gives new meaning to the phrase “reading between the lines,” pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot…

Read More about In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

GTSI Settlement Could Mark Crackdown on Contracting Abuses

November 3, 2010

GTSI Settlement Could Mark Crackdown on Contracting Abuses

By: Ifrah Law

The U.S. Small Business Administration has announced a tough settlement with GTSI Corp., one of the nation’s largest government contractors. GTSI, which had been accused of improperly obtaining contracts that are meant for small businesses, avoided a one-year suspension from new work for the federal government. But two of its top executives are stepping down, three others are suspended, and the company has agreed to…

Read More about GTSI Settlement Could Mark Crackdown on Contracting Abuses

In Federal Sentencing, Age Begins to Matter

October 29, 2010

In Federal Sentencing, Age Begins to Matter

By: Ifrah Law

On November 1, 2010, a new amendment to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines will go into effect that will allow a judge to consider a defendant’s age far more often than before in handing down a sentence in federal court.  We think this change will have a major impact on sentencing in white-collar criminal cases. Defendants in financial crimes tend to be older, so even a…

Read More about In Federal Sentencing, Age Begins to Matter

The Foreclosure Crisis: Don’t Believe Everything You Read

October 22, 2010

The Foreclosure Crisis: Don’t Believe Everything You Read

By: Ifrah Law

Legal pressure is mounting against the firms involved in the nationwide foreclosure crisis. In the wake of reports that possibly fraudulent court documents were used to fast-track home foreclosures, a federal Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force is investigating possible criminal violations committed by banks and mortgage companies. We need to ask: What laws are available to prosecutors? After all, people can do plenty of things…

Read More about The Foreclosure Crisis: Don’t Believe Everything You Read

FTC Getting Serious About Full Disclosure in Endorsements

October 20, 2010

FTC Getting Serious About Full Disclosure in Endorsements

By: Ifrah Law

The Federal Trade Commission is taking steps to show that it is quite serious about enforcing the so-called blogger disclosure rules that it issued last year. The rules say, essentially, that when someone endorses or reviews a product or service, the person must disclose any relationship with the company that produces the product. So if a blogger gets a free item from a manufacturer, the…

Read More about FTC Getting Serious About Full Disclosure in Endorsements

Banned From the Internet: A Term of Probation That Is Overly Restrictive

October 11, 2010

Banned From the Internet: A Term of Probation That Is Overly Restrictive

By: Ifrah Law

The following opinion article by Ifrah PLLC founding partner A. Jeff Ifrah and associate Steven Eichorn appeared in the National Law Journal on October 11, 2010. Banned from the Internet Prohibiting a defendant on probation from conducting any business online is overly restrictive and not reasonably related to legitimate sentencing goals. By A. Jeff Ifrah and Steven Eichorn The Internet is becoming the town square for…

Read More about Banned From the Internet: A Term of Probation That Is Overly Restrictive

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Judging the Judges

Judging the Judges
By: Lauren Scribner

Dismissive of Dismissal

Dismissive of Dismissal
By: James Trusty

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.
By: Robert Ward

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights