In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

August 18, 2026

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

By: Robert Ward

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally. Any attorney who has litigated a case against a party proceeding pro se is familiar with the common refrain that courts liberally construe pro se filings.[1] This leniency was not enough for one Connecticut litigant. In a scheme that gives new meaning to the phrase “reading between the lines,” pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot included hidden instructions in his filings with the goal of ensuring any AI model’s output would agree with his position. In doing so, Elliot undertook what appears to be the first confirmed prompt injection attack aimed at an American court. The Attempted Prompt Injection On July 24, 2026, pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot filed what…

Read More about In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

June 29, 2026

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

By: Lauren Scribner

The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), 50 U.S.C. § 4025a, grants military spouses portability of their professional licenses. That means when a military spouse moves with his or her servicemember to the servicemember’s assigned duty station in a new state, the spouse’s professional license essentially moves with them.[1] In order to take advantage of this license portability benefit in the new state, the SCRA requires…

Read More about The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

June 22, 2026

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

By: James Trusty

As any federal criminal practitioner can attest, judges holding a sentencing hearing are privy to an intentionally wider universe of information about the defendant than a jury would have heard about at trial. We want judges to consider all sorts of things about the offender and the offense, beyond just the facts establishing the crime – social background, employment history, criminal record, substance abuse history, mental health issues, and more. Particularly in…

Read More about How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

Fourth Amendment the Loser in BALCO Ruling

September 27, 2010

Fourth Amendment the Loser in BALCO Ruling

By: Ifrah Law

A recent ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit is a win for Major League Baseball players whose drug-testing records must now be returned to them after they were improperly seized in a 2002 federal steroids probe. But it’s not a win for Fourth Amendment values. In a September 13, 2010, en banc ruling, the appeals court took a major step…

Read More about Fourth Amendment the Loser in BALCO Ruling

For Convicted CEO, Legal Fee Payment Depends on the Agreement

September 17, 2010

For Convicted CEO, Legal Fee Payment Depends on the Agreement

By: Ifrah Law

When is a company obliged to pay the legal fees of a wayward employee? The answer generally depends on the precise wording of the employee agreement, if an agreement exists.   A good case in point is the recent one of Frances Flood, the CEO of ClearOne Communications, who left the company in 2004 while under SEC investigation. Things didn’t turn out well for her:…

Read More about For Convicted CEO, Legal Fee Payment Depends on the Agreement

Impeachment Trial of Federal Judge Raises Issue of ‘Kickbacks’

September 16, 2010

Impeachment Trial of Federal Judge Raises Issue of ‘Kickbacks’

By: Ifrah Law

The impeachment trial of U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr. is continuing before a U.S. Senate committee. Porteous, a federal judge in New Orleans, is accused of four counts of corruption. Each count is referred to as an article of impeachment. The first article of impeachment involves what some have described as a “kickback” scheme. Porteous, as a state court judge before he was…

Read More about Impeachment Trial of Federal Judge Raises Issue of ‘Kickbacks’

Why Did Craigslist End ‘Adult Services’ Section?

September 6, 2010

Why Did Craigslist End ‘Adult Services’ Section?

By: Ifrah Law

We noted last May that the popular Craigslist website faced major flak from state attorneys general and from anti-prostitution groups over its “Adult Personals” section, which many say was a thinly veiled venue for prostitution. On September 3, Craigslist abruptly discontinued the “Adult Personals” section and replaced the link with the word “Censored.” Craigslist didn’t state any reason for this step, and many observers are…

Read More about Why Did Craigslist End ‘Adult Services’ Section?

Md. Case: An Issue of Medical Judgment or Criminal Fraud?

September 3, 2010

Md. Case: An Issue of Medical Judgment or Criminal Fraud?

By: Ifrah Law

On September 1, 2010, John R. McLean, a former cardiologist based in Salisbury, Md., was indicted by a federal grand jury for health care fraud and for making false statements to Medicare and Medicaid. McLean is charged with performing operations to insert stents – devices to treat coronary disease – in the arteries of patients who did not need them according to accepted medical practice,…

Read More about Md. Case: An Issue of Medical Judgment or Criminal Fraud?

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.
By: Robert Ward

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families
By: Lauren Scribner

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights