Excited mature businessman wearing a VR headset and experiencing virtual reality in his office

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

January 7, 2025

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

By: James Trusty

A Florida Judge may have unwittingly ushered in a new age of criminal justice, where slickly made virtual reality (“VR”) presentations turn judges and jurors into witnesses, and VR headsets provide subjective “testimony” in a powerful and difficult to challenge manner. Broward County Judge Andrew Siegel agreed to don a virtual reality headset in a preliminary proceeding[1] where the defendant was accused of aggravated assault. Miguel Albisu, the defendant, was accused of waving a gun at wedding guests and he claims self-defense. The defense hired an artist to create a “defendant’s perspective,” and the result is a historical first—the judge took in a defense expert’s testimony about self-defense that included a guided tour of the reality contained on a VR…

Read More about Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

December 6, 2024

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

By: James Trusty

As the presiding judge scolded Hunter Biden’s attorneys this week, “The Constitution provides the President with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1, but nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history.”[1]  But what exactly is that history he claims is being re-written? Judge Scarsi was challenging…

Read More about How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

Supremely Improbable

July 30, 2024

Supremely Improbable

By: James Trusty

President Biden’s pronounced objectives for Supreme Court “reform” are improbable, politically lifeless under a particularly lame duck presidency, and motivated by transparently November-driven calculations. But even if the proposed changes are doomed from the start, they push public discourse on a couple of issues that are red meat for the democrats. The stated reforms are superficially simple ones: 1) to “clarify” that “there is no…

Read More about Supremely Improbable

N.J. Again Passes Online-Poker Bill; Decision Now in Governor’s Hands

December 20, 2012

N.J. Again Passes Online-Poker Bill; Decision Now in Governor’s Hands

By: Ifrah Law

New Jersey could soon become the third state to legalize online gaming within its borders. Its State Senate on December 20, 2012, voted 33-3 to legalize online poker in the state. The General Assembly had previously approved the bill by a vote of 48-25-3. The bill was able to achieve significant bipartisan support in both houses of the state legislature. The bill will now be…

Read More about N.J. Again Passes Online-Poker Bill; Decision Now in Governor’s Hands

Court’s Strict Interpretation of Bank Fraud Law May Rein In Prosecutors

December 11, 2012

Court’s Strict Interpretation of Bank Fraud Law May Rein In Prosecutors

By: Ifrah Law

A recent interpretation of the federal bank fraud statute by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit may prove to be a useful check to overreaching by federal prosecutors, who have tended to use that statute in the past as a catch-all law enforcement tool. In United States v. Nkansah, the Court reviewed the conviction of a defendant for bank fraud and…

Read More about Court’s Strict Interpretation of Bank Fraud Law May Rein In Prosecutors

D.C. Circuit: Restitution Order Must Involve Victim’s Loss, Not Defendant’s Gain

December 5, 2012

D.C. Circuit: Restitution Order Must Involve Victim’s Loss, Not Defendant’s Gain

By: Ifrah Law

On November 9, 2012, in a unanimous opinion in United States v. Fair, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit found that the district court had abused its discretion in ordering restitution in the amount of $743,000 in a criminal copyright infringement case. The appeals court vacated the lower court’s restitution order, finding that the order was based on “a clear legal and…

Read More about D.C. Circuit: Restitution Order Must Involve Victim’s Loss, Not Defendant’s Gain

Are Medicaid Claims Becoming the Next Battleground for FCA Cases?

December 4, 2012

Are Medicaid Claims Becoming the Next Battleground for FCA Cases?

By: Ifrah Law

A qui tam case that was recently dismissed on summary judgment may signal the next front in the legal enforcement war arising from off-label use of prescription medications. In United States ex rel. Watson v. King-Vassel et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the complaint alleged that defendant Dr. Jennifer King-Vassel violated the Federal False Claims Act and…

Read More about Are Medicaid Claims Becoming the Next Battleground for FCA Cases?

New DOJ Guide on FCPA Provides Guidance, Gives Statute a Broad Reading

November 26, 2012

New DOJ Guide on FCPA Provides Guidance, Gives Statute a Broad Reading

By: Ifrah Law

After much uncertainty and discussion, the U.S. Department of Justice has finally issued official guidance regarding who qualifies as a “foreign official” under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). This guidance was published on November 14, 2012, in the Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a broad guide to enforcement and interpretation of the FCPA that the DOJ issued jointly with the…

Read More about New DOJ Guide on FCPA Provides Guidance, Gives Statute a Broad Reading

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality

Virtual Reality Creating Jury Reality
By: James Trusty

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power

How Thick is the Blanket? – Preemptive Pardons as a Presidential Power
By: James Trusty

Supremely Improbable

Supremely Improbable
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights