In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

August 18, 2026

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

By: Robert Ward

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally. Any attorney who has litigated a case against a party proceeding pro se is familiar with the common refrain that courts liberally construe pro se filings.[1] This leniency was not enough for one Connecticut litigant. In a scheme that gives new meaning to the phrase “reading between the lines,” pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot included hidden instructions in his filings with the goal of ensuring any AI model’s output would agree with his position. In doing so, Elliot undertook what appears to be the first confirmed prompt injection attack aimed at an American court. The Attempted Prompt Injection On July 24, 2026, pro se plaintiff Matthew Elliot filed what…

Read More about In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

June 29, 2026

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

By: Lauren Scribner

The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), 50 U.S.C. § 4025a, grants military spouses portability of their professional licenses. That means when a military spouse moves with his or her servicemember to the servicemember’s assigned duty station in a new state, the spouse’s professional license essentially moves with them.[1] In order to take advantage of this license portability benefit in the new state, the SCRA requires…

Read More about The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

June 22, 2026

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

By: James Trusty

As any federal criminal practitioner can attest, judges holding a sentencing hearing are privy to an intentionally wider universe of information about the defendant than a jury would have heard about at trial. We want judges to consider all sorts of things about the offender and the offense, beyond just the facts establishing the crime – social background, employment history, criminal record, substance abuse history, mental health issues, and more. Particularly in…

Read More about How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

Reading the Plea Leaves

October 25, 2023

Reading the Plea Leaves

By: James Trusty

Are guilty pleas in Fulton County confirming the righteousness of Fani Willis’ RICO prosecution or do they reflect an inherent frailty of the case, even in a venue where jurors largely can be expected to instinctively support a prosecution of high-profile Republicans? A close look at the recent plea agreements suggests that prosecutorial victory laps are premature. While the indictment itself has joined the ranks…

Read More about Reading the Plea Leaves

Not a Grande Victory for DOJ

September 13, 2023

Not a Grande Victory for DOJ

By: James Trusty

Frustrated with the massive influx of aliens into Texas, Texas Governor Greg Abbott came up with a plan that was physically simple, but legally complex: drop a 1000-foot-long buoy barrier into the middle of the Rio Grande. The four-foot spherical orange buoys were chained together and anchored to the riverbed near the town of Eagle Pass—a sector that reported 270,000 encounters with migrants during the…

Read More about Not a Grande Victory for DOJ

When Acquitted Conduct Becomes Untouchable

July 27, 2023

When Acquitted Conduct Becomes Untouchable

By: James Trusty

Alphonse Gabriel Capone was never prosecuted for murder, so there was never a jury determining whether Al was responsible for the infamous St. Valentine’s Day Massacre in which seven gang rivals were executed by Capone’s underlings. Instead, “Scarface” Capone was prosecuted and convicted for felony tax evasion offenses, for which he received 11 years in prison. Since that conviction in 1931, the concept of “getting…

Read More about When Acquitted Conduct Becomes Untouchable

True Threats and True Agendas

July 6, 2023

True Threats and True Agendas

By: James Trusty

Last week’s Supreme Court opinion on the “true threats” doctrine seemingly settles a long- brewing issue in threat-based prosecutions but also reflects the anticipatory positioning of various Associate Justices on much hotter issues that may make their way to SCOTUS consideration in the near future. As such, the debate-behind-the-debate between the Court’s members is of great interest to those who like predicting the next big…

Read More about True Threats and True Agendas

Robocop Finds His Man, But Man Gets Robocop’s Instruction Manual

June 22, 2023

Robocop Finds His Man, But Man Gets Robocop’s Instruction Manual

By: James Trusty

Many years ago, a prosecutor I worked with at the time was in a fascinating murder trial, where the defense included a forensic psychiatrist opining that the defendant suffered from multiple personalities. According to this expert, one of the “inhabitants” of the defendant’s mind was a creature named Tofu the Demon Dog. On cross examination, the doctor volunteered to the jury that these distinct personalities…

Read More about Robocop Finds His Man, But Man Gets Robocop’s Instruction Manual

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.

In the age of AI, litigators must read between the lines—literally.
By: Robert Ward

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families

The DOJ Steps Up for Military Families
By: Lauren Scribner

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings

How Much is Too Much? – Second Circuit Establishes Guardrails for Sentencing Hearings
By: James Trusty

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights