White-Collar Sentencing Under the Amended Guidelines: Fewer Steps, Same Dance

White-Collar Sentencing Under the Amended Guidelines: Fewer Steps, Same Dance

November 12, 2025

White-Collar Sentencing Under the Amended Guidelines: Fewer Steps, Same Dance

By: Robert Ward

For years, the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Guidelines Manual has guided courts through a three-step process to determine the sentence to be imposed. At a high level, that process looked like this: First, the court would calculate the guideline range based on relevant offense conduct and related factors, along with the defendant’s criminal history.  Second, the court would consider the Sentencing Commission’s policy statements or commentary relating to “departures” from the guidelines as well as the defendant’s specific personal characteristics. Third, and finally, the court would consider the statutory factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in determining the sentence to be imposed (whether within the guideline range or varying in either direction). As of November 1, 2025, this three-step…

Read More about White-Collar Sentencing Under the Amended Guidelines: Fewer Steps, Same Dance

Personal Information Flo-wing out of Control

October 20, 2025

Personal Information Flo-wing out of Control

By: Lauren Scribner

In September, a nearly $60 million settlement was reached in Frasco, et al v. Flo Health, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, LLC, and Flurry, Inc.  The case,[1] a class action filed in 2021, alleged inter alia that Flo Health Inc. (“Flo”), a popular women’s health tracking application estimated to have over 38 million monthly users, invaded the privacy of its users by sharing personal and…

Read More about Personal Information Flo-wing out of Control

New Laws for AI Developers: California’s Fork in the AI Regulatory Road

October 16, 2025

New Laws for AI Developers: California’s Fork in the AI Regulatory Road

By: Steven Hess

AI Regulation and The Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act Artificial intelligence (“AI”) products have become an increasingly significant aspect of U.S. innovation, growth, and development.  Generative AI is being used to predict the structure of proteins and other biomolecules in pharmaceutical research,[1] to simulate wargames for the U.S. military,[2] and to drive an estimated hundreds of billions of dollars of growth in sectors from…

Read More about New Laws for AI Developers: California’s Fork in the AI Regulatory Road

Judge Strikes Down FBI’s Use of ‘National Security Letters’

March 29, 2013

Judge Strikes Down FBI’s Use of ‘National Security Letters’

By: Ifrah Law

In a recent decision, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston of the Northern District of California struck down the FBI’s use of National Security Letters (NSLs) as unconstitutional. Unbeknownst to most Americans, the FBI has been issuing thousands of NSLs every year. The letters demand that recipients, such as banks and telephone companies, provide customers’ information such as their transactional records, phone numbers dialed, and email…

Read More about Judge Strikes Down FBI’s Use of ‘National Security Letters’

Court: Data on Unsecured Network May Qualify for 4th Amendment Protection

March 11, 2013

Court: Data on Unsecured Network May Qualify for 4th Amendment Protection

By: Ifrah Law

The vast increase in the use of wireless data networks has led to new legal issues regarding network users’ right to privacy. A recent opinion issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon indicates that, under some circumstances, individuals on an unsecured wireless network have a reasonable expectation of privacy entitling them to Fourth Amendment protection. As a result, police officers must…

Read More about Court: Data on Unsecured Network May Qualify for 4th Amendment Protection

Was This Identity Theft? Sixth Circuit Should Limit Meaning of That Term

March 5, 2013

Was This Identity Theft? Sixth Circuit Should Limit Meaning of That Term

By: Nicole Kardell

What’s in a name? When you think of identity theft, you typically think of someone taking a person’s name plus some other identifiers, like their address and Social Security number or credit card number, to go on a spending spree or drain the victim’s bank account. You may think of fraudulent impersonation. But what if someone falsely stated that another person gave him permission to…

Read More about Was This Identity Theft? Sixth Circuit Should Limit Meaning of That Term

Va. Court Declines to Decide Status of Poker Under State’s Gambling Law

March 4, 2013

Va. Court Declines to Decide Status of Poker Under State’s Gambling Law

By: Ifrah Law

On February 28, 2013, the Virginia Supreme Court issued an opinion in which it declined to address the legality of playing poker in the state but left open the possibility for the issue to be decided in a future case. The full opinion in the case, Daniels v. Mobley, is available here. Charles Daniels, a former poker hall operator who operated charitable bingo halls in…

Read More about Va. Court Declines to Decide Status of Poker Under State’s Gambling Law

This Gaming Case Didn’t Have to Be Prosecuted

February 26, 2013

This Gaming Case Didn’t Have to Be Prosecuted

By: Ifrah Law

A Nevada man now has a criminal record – simply because he placed a bet in a casino in Las Vegas and a casino employee didn’t ask him enough questions. Robert Walker recently pleaded guilty in federal court to one misdemeanor count involving a record-keeping violation and was sentenced to one year of unsupervised probation. He was also ordered to pay a $250 fine and…

Read More about This Gaming Case Didn’t Have to Be Prosecuted

Articles and Presentations by Our Firm Attorneys

White-Collar Sentencing Under the Amended Guidelines: Fewer Steps, Same Dance

White-Collar Sentencing Under the Amended Guidelines: Fewer Steps, Same Dance
By: Robert Ward

Personal Information Flo-wing out of Control

Personal Information Flo-wing out of Control
By: Lauren Scribner

New Laws for AI Developers: California’s Fork in the AI Regulatory Road

New Laws for AI Developers: California’s Fork in the AI Regulatory Road
By: Steven Hess

Subscribe to Ifrah Law’s Insights